This item proposes a text amendment to City’s Land Development Code establishing reasonable time limits for development review applications to be declared inactive. As proposed in the attached Ordinance, applications without activity, for a period of six (6) months, on the part of the Owner/Applicant may be declared inactive.
Inactive status is defined as a period of six (6) months without activity by the owner/applicant, including but not limited to:
- Failure to respond to correspondence from the City; or
- Failure to submit or resubmit revised plans as part of the Development Review Committee (DRC) process; or
- Failure to take affirmative action to move a project forward; or
- As otherwise reasonably determined by the DRC.
To ensure the Applicant is provided the opportunity to be heard, the following steps will occur prior to declaring an application withdrawn after 6 months of inactivity:
- The application will be placed on a Development Review Committee (DRC) agenda for consideration.
- Notice will be sent to the owner/applicant by electronic or regular mail.
- The DRC will consider the item.
Please note: Activity by owners/applicants in response to the hearing notice shall not constitute activity sufficient to deem a file active.
There will also be a statement on all development application and Neighborhood Participation Meeting forms informing applicants of the expiration time limit.
In addition, the proposed ordinance amendment will now require Applicants to submit a complete application within 6 months of holding the Neighborhood Participation Meeting.
Updated Information for Second Reading:
Asa result of feedback received during first reading, the following modifications have been made and are identified in the attached additions are double underlined and deletions are stricken thru.
- A reapplication fee will be established by Resolution adopted by the City Commission.
- Applicants may appeal applications deemed withdrawn by the DRC to the Planning and Zoning Board.
- "Or other non-responsive actions by the applicant to address DRC concerns as reasonably determined by the DRC." has been added. Examples of these non-responsive actions would include situations in which:
- Only automated or form responses have been provided by the applicant in response to staff inquiries;
- The applicant no longer owns or no longer has a contract for use of the property; or
- Resubmittal that do not address any DRC comments.